Shortly after Purism crowd-funded the Librem 5 $650 privacy-oriented Linux smartphone, Pine64 announced the PinePhone, a $150 entry level alternative with similar design, aim and specifications. So which one should you choose - and why is the Librem 5 much higher cost still worth the investment?

Technical specifications and performance

Technical specifications for these two devices happen to be very similar, as you can see below, with the Librem 5 offering slightly better performance and the PinePhone coming with a larger display.

The Librem 5 offers much better cameras and longer battery life, whereas the PinePhone comes first in terms of price and quick charging support.

The Librem 5 GPU also offers better performance and mainline kernel drivers, though neither of the two devices is designed for intensive gaming.

Software support

This is probably the key difference between the Librem 5 and the PinePhone. Purism created its own "GNOME Mobile" shell from scratch, writing a lightweight Wayland Gtk desktop optimized for touch devices and adapting most GNOME apps to a mobile UX (e.g. by developing libhandy, which has made several upstream GNOME apps mobile-friendly). Essentially, Purism invested most of the Librem 5 earnings on creating a fully convergent Linux desktop (and contributing upstream to GNOME) in a somewhat Ubuntu Touch like fashion.

On the other hand, Pine64 opted for a community-based approach: they provide the base hardware and OS to users and developers, and the community develops the needed software to make it run. postmarketOS and (Ubports) Ubuntu Touch developers have already ported their OS to the PinePhone development kits, and KDE Plasma Mobile will be the primary desktop designed for this phone. About $10 for each device will be donated to open source projects.

In conclusion, the choice of the device is mostly up to your desktop preferences (Librem 5: GNOME, PinePhone: Plasma), which will however be both available on both devices. Investing in a Librem 5, however, means supporting the development of mobile Linux distributions, so the higher cost is not unjustified.

Privacy and "libre" hardware

Both devices are highly privacy-oriented, with kill switches for most (or all, in the case of the Librem 5) sensors and hardware. However, only the Librem 5 is certified to be fully free software when it comes to kernel, drivers and bootloader, and unlike the PinePhone is endorsed by the Free Software Foundation for a Linux experience that will be, with much effort, one of the rare ones to be entirely free from proprietary software.

Availability

Both devices will be realistically shipped before the end of 2019 (Q3 for the Librem 5, Q4 for the PinePhone), with support for worldwide LTE bands.

Conclusion

As you can see, both devices are perfectly reasonable choices for people with slightly different preferences and needs. If you need performance and a fully privacy-respecting, libre smartphone, the Purism Librem 5 is probably your best bet. However, if you just need a low-cost, entry-level Linux mobile device, and prefer Plasma to the GNOME ecosystem, the PinePhone will probably be more than satisfying.

You can pre-order the Librem 5 from puri.sm, and the PinePhone from the PINE64 website once it is released. In case you are still in doubt, feel free to join us at r/tuxphones, and we will be happy to help you choose one.